Attorney General Dominic Grieve
on Tuesday overruled three judges who decided last month that the
public had a right to see what sort of advice the prince was offering to
the government.
Charles has been open about his opinions on a range of subjects. But
Britons reading the "particularly frank" letters might not think the
prince is politically neutral, as a monarch must be, thus undermining
the institution, Grieve said.
"Much of the correspondence does indeed reflect the Prince of Wales'
most deeply held personal views and beliefs," Grieve said in a statement
setting out his reasoning.
The letters "contain remarks about public affairs which would in my
view, if revealed, have had a material effect upon the willingness of
the government to engage in correspondence with the Prince of Wales, and
would potentially have undermined his position of political
neutrality."
Britain's constitutional monarch has no political power, but meets regularly with prime ministers and other senior politicians to talk about events of the day.
Grieve decided that the prince's letter-writing was part of his
preparation to succeed his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, to the throne.
It's been a lengthy education, with Charles, 63, standing next in line
since 1952.
Charles has not been secretive about his opinions on topics such as
education, architecture, religion, the environment, organic food and
homeopathy. It marks a sharp contrast with his 86-year-old mother, whose
personal opinions — except for her Christian faith — are not known to
her subjects.
The decision protecting Charles' privacy angered opponents who want more disclosure.
"It's an open secret that Prince Charles lobbies the government,"
said Graham Smith, chief executive of Republic, a group which wants to
abolish the monarchy. "What the public has a right to know is what he is
lobbying for and whether he is actually influencing policy,"
Last month's court ruling came in
response to requests by The Guardian newspaper, which has been asking
for seven years for letters from Charles to government departments.
Several government departments
had refused to divulge them, arguing it might breach unwritten
constitutional rules on the relationship between the monarchy and the
government, and that it would discourage the prince from speaking
frankly. ( Associated Press )
No comments:
Post a Comment